NWO Antichrist's use Gays to assault marriage.

Few Gays Opt To Marry
By Henry Makow PhD
12-12-7

Despite the example set by these Royal Canadian Mounted Police officers, less than one-in-20 gays took advantage of Canada's decision to legalize marriage in June 2005, according to a census a year later.

Gays make up just 0.1% of all married couples, a proportion which is consistent with other countries that permit same-sex marriage.

In other words, the definition of the most

important heterosexual institution was

changed to satisfy one couple in one thousand.

This information is crucial to Americans

where only Massachusetts permits

same-sex marriage but as many as

eleven other states are considering it.

In terms of numbers, Statistics Canada

calculated that about one percent of the

Canadian population ;are gay or

bisexual, well below the estimates we

normally hear. (StasCan Daily "

Community Health Survey" , June 15

2004, p. 9) This works out to 316,900

people. The 2006 census found 7465

married same-sex couples, fewer than

15,000 men and women.

Roughly a quarter of Canadian gays

(75,000) prefer "common law"

relationships. There is no way to

gauge their permanence or exclusivity.

The vast majority of homosexuals don't

want gay marriage. It is being foisted on

them and on society by elite social

engineers using the media, government

and a few activists. The goal is to

undermine heterosexual marriage by

obscuring its true character. The

purpose is to destroy the family and

render society more vulnerable to

world government dictatorship by

the central bankers.

GAYS DON'T WANT MARRIAGE

The majority of gays regard same-sex

marriage as a diversion from more

important issues.

This view is expressed by Gareth Kirby

in an editorial in Capital Xtra, an Ottawa

gay newspaper, Oct. 18, 2007.

"Remember the headlines...that claimed

we were flocking to city hall and churches

to get the deed done as courts legalized

same-sex marriage in province after

province? ...It was a lie. Very few among

us are eager to embrace marriage rights...

"Didn't we just spend a decade and by

some estimates $2 million to wage wage

this fight? Didn't we just put all our other

major issues virtually on ice because

some couples, a few lawyers, and a couple

of out-of-touch lobby groups decided

that same-sex marriage was the only

thing that really mattered...

"Marriage is a heterosexual institution

designed by the church, endorse by the

state, with the intention of controlling

the sexuality of women and by extension,

their husbands...

"I don't expect the wedding rate will pick

up. We have something better in our

relationships, something that allows for

a variety of friendships, fuck buddies,

lovers, sisters and ex's. We don 't put

all the pressures on one person...

"We don't need the limitations of marriage. So

we're taking a pass. But what waste of time

and money, and a tragic diversion of

focus, in that decade-long fight."

As Kirby suggests, being gay is about

not marrying and being monogamous. It

is farcical and tragic that heterosexual

society should be sacrificed on the altar

of gay marriage. Marriage-minded gays

should be given a separate status with

equal benefits and responsibilities.

THE MEDIA LOVES GAY MARRIAGE

The Canadian media has ignored the tepid gay

response to marriage and tried instead to

create the impression that traditional marriage

is on the rocks. The fact the mass media is

singing from an identical song sheet is

further proof that it is directed by the

central banking cartel.

In an article in The Hill Times (Sept.

24, 2007) Tom Korski writes:

[The media] "depicted gay Canadians

enthusiastically embracing traditional

roles at the exact moment the rest of

society spirals into family dysfunction."

'Thank heavens for gay marriage,' wrote

Globe and Mail columnist Margaret

Went. 'Without it, the most ancient of

our social institutions would be in even

worse decline than it already is.'

Other journalists advised readers "the

nuclear family is fading away," (Edmonton

Sun) and that "same sex couples are

taking the reins" (CTV.ca), or mocked

the myth of the perfect family," (Vancouver

Sun) and lamented "there is no such

thing as traditional family anymore."

(Moose Jaw Times Herald)

In one comically inelegant phrase CTV

National's Lloyd Robertson told viewers,

"If you're part of a so-called traditional

family where the children are raised by

a mother and father who are married, you

seem to be in a declining breed."

(End of Korski)

Meanwhile the gay lobby behind the

legalization of same-sex marriage is

releasing statistics that exaggerate the

number of gay marriages by about

%65. This lobby is called "Egale" and

it is funded by IBM and a number of

other anonymous corporations, as

well as by the federal government.

CONCLUSION

Today, people who advance in the

fields of government, education,

media and big business generally

belong to a colonial elite. They

represent the London-based

Masonic-Zionist central banking

cartel which is colonizing us all in

a 1984-style "world government." They

are waging psychological war on society

to undermine our ability to resist.

The nuclear family is the basic building

block of society. We derive our identity,

meaning, values and security from

it. Heterosexual marriage is the basis

for raising the new generation to be

productive responsible citizens. It is

based on the exchange of female

power for male love which awakens

the man's protective and constructive

instincts. It is an essential step in our

personal development and fulfillment.

The promotion of gay marriage has nothing

to do with the welfare of homosexuals. As

with feminism,it is designed to increase

sex-role confusion, divorce, and

depopulation. By conflating hetero and

homosexual marriage, straights are

being encouraged to emulate gays,

who generally are not monogamous

and do not have children. This is part

of a wider attack on our gender

identity ( i.e. masculinity and femininity.)

Did we need to legalize gay marriage to

accomodate one couple in one thousand?

No. The central bankers

legalized it to destroy the nuclear family

and change societal norms. By arresting

our personal development, they are

ensuring that humanity remains under

their tutelage, a perpetual under-achiever.

----

Note: I am indebted to the Nov. Dec 2007

issue of Reality. This publication is sponsored

by the Real Women of Canada

www.realwomenca.com

I highly recommend it.

See also my: "Canada Redefines Marriage"

and "Heterosexual Society is Under Siege"

at www.henrymakow.com

----------------------

Henry Makow Ph.D. is the author of "Cruel

Hoax: Feminism and the New World Order

" www.cruelhoax.ca He welcomes your

concise comments at hmakow@gmail.com

Comment

Paul

Henry I'm a Gay man in a twenty three

year monagamous, committed

relationship. Your article on gay

Marriage is a beauty. I found myself

in pretty much full agreement with

what you were saying. We have no

interest in marriage, and never saw

it as an issue. Still don't. We won't

be having kids obviously so for us

marriage would just be a validation

of our relationship. We already have

that every day we are together, we

don't need to advertise it to the

world. The Gay Marriage agenda

has come from somewhere else,

not from people like us. I find it

all a trifle embarrassing really. I

know too many queens who can't

even conduct a grown-up relationship

with their right hand let alone another

person, and we are now seeing way too

many hetero relationships breaking down

around us as well. Too much enforced

culture of selfishness and hedonism

being pushed on all of us, and too much

temptation for transient (ultimately

meaningless) pleasures. And I'm sick

to death of self appointed activists

always telling us what it is we want.

Paul in Australia

http://www.rense.com/general79/fewd.htm