Texas Body Snatchers
The Bible would never have taken off if US law enforcement
agencies had been around. They would smother the sublime
quest of mankind in its infancy, sending the twelve sons of Israel
into foster care in Sodom, for their good old sire had four wives
and loved them all. On second thought, the Bible would not even
have come that far either, as their ancestor Abraham, this fountain
of our faith, would have been locked up for the same sin. That is, if
he had not been locked up earlier for teaching his children at home,
instead of sending them to the Pharaoh’s school, or for
giving birth at home. Every aspect of normal behaviour mankind
was used to, has become criminalised in the new American legality.
In beginning of April, hamfisted Texan police swooped on a remote
Mormon ranch, and arrested the men and carried away the women
and their children and babies, separating them from their mothers. A
judge allowed separating even nursing breastfed babies, giving them
to foster care.
This snatching case, where the police took away 437 children and
babies from their parents who preferred to live an alternative
communal family lifestyle, has advanced the US well beyond any
grim vision of totalitarianism ever envisaged by real-life
politicians. Americans have already entered the realm of extreme
social engineering trod by the LSD writer Aldous Huxley. In that
realm of the United Totalitarian States, happy families are
being broken up, and hundreds of babies and children are given
into adoption to single gender couples. People have lost their
children to the state for failing to expose them to the moronising
power of the TV[1], or refusing to send them to the state
schools. Some have lost their lives as well: in Utah, a John Singer
was shot dead for trying to keep his children out of school. The
holocaust of Waco with its dozens of parents and children
murdered for no sin but their sturdy independence was just
the first swallow of elimination of private life in America.
The Texas police had used a false claim in order to justify their
action. They claimed a member of the family, one Sarah Barlow,
had lodged a complaint. Soon it became clear that the complaint
was made by a delusionary outsider woman with a history of false
reports, and probably in cahoots with police. There never was a
Sarah Barlow. The good wives and daughters of the Texan
dissidents were placed under terrible pressure, amounting to
torture: they were not even allowed to nurse their babies,
unless they bear false witness against their husbands and
fathers. It is amazing that all of them withstood the torture and
remained faithful. What made the Texan police use such extreme
measures against people who peacefully carried on with their lives?
There is a good reason for this onslaught on privacy: The policy of
Total Spectrum Dominance promoted by the Neocons does not refer
to far away lands only, to unruly Afghanistan or disobedient
France. It refers to you. It is you, Americans, they want to dominate
totally; by controlling your lifestyle and punishing every free
thought andact. And in order to dominate, they need to smash all
compartments; first of all, Family. Nothing may stay between an
individual and the State. By way of projection, your ideologists
ascribe this attitude to your erstwhile enemies, Hitler and Stalin,
but as a matter of fact both arch-villains were strongest supporters
of family. Stalin terminated the free run of wild-eyed feminists he
inherited from the Revolution days; while even today, any reference
to family values is considered “pro-Nazi” in Zionist-occupied
Merkel’s Germany. It is to the third force of liberal totalitarianism
that we owe this last and definite attack on Family.
In a normal world, the Texas kidnapping would be condemned by
every voice until the children were free and back in the custody of
their parents,until the kidnappers were safely locked in jail. Instead,
the American papers and internet sites bother with Tibetan monks’
inalienable right to own serfs and the evil Chinamen’s interfering with
this right. They discuss whether the Japanese may eat whales (no,
they may not) and whether the US corporations may consume
millions of starving people by turning their food into fuel (yes,
they may). At the same time, they allow the oldest and most natural
freedom of forming family life to be eroded and undermined. Why
don’t presidential candidates Obama, Clinton and McCain demand
safe release of the Texas prisoners – before the Bush regime
rides into sunrise to impose his version of permissible intercourse
on the rest of mankind?
The enemies of your freedom, the proprietors of your media, have
prepared for this onslaught for a long time. They spread malicious
rumours of frequent parental child abuse to undermine the natural
tie between children and parents. They constructed a fictitious
offence of flirting with a girl and called it “harassment”. They
invented a “plague of the 20th century”, AIDS, though this malady
occupies umpteenth place in the list of dangerous diseases, well
after obesity. They promoted and elevated homosexual activity on
their TV channels and in official propaganda – all that in order to
eliminate family and turn you into obedient tools in their hands.
Read More.......