Friday, November 23, 2007

The foolishness of gun control

11/21/2007 9:22:00 AM
The foolishness of gun control

Scott McPherson

I sent a pro-gun commentary from a British newspaper to a liberal friend of
mine, and he replied that if we just banned the manufacture of firearms on a
worldwide level there wouldn't be any crime or genocides like the one going
on in Darfur. He then suggested that I had joined a militia group. I replied,

"I'm sure there were a lot of Rwandans who wish they'd had a gun - especially
a good weapon like the Kalashnikov - to protect themselves, their families, and
their communities from rampaging Hutus. Cutting off firearms 'at the
manufacturers' level' - or more accurately, at the level where only the government
could legally import weapons and only government soldiers could legally have
one - left literally hundreds of thousands - some estimates say upwards of a
million - at the mercy of machete-wielding thugs who chopped them and their
families and their communities to bits.

"The absence of firearms did not save anyone, did not deter anyone. Instead, it
cost about a million lives. And it only took about three months."

In the 20th century, tyrannical governments were responsible for approximately
170,000,000 nonmilitary deaths: Armenian Christians in Turkey, "undesirables"
of all sorts in Soviet Russia and Nazi Germany, political dissenters in Nationalist
and later Communist China, Mayan aboriginals in Guatemala, Ugandans,
Cambodians, and the ethnic Tutsis of Rwanda.

In every single case, the victims were first subjected to mass disarmament.

The National Academy of Sciences - hardly a pro-gun organization - admitted
that after years of researching the effects of "gun control" it could not conclude
that any measure had been effective at reducing crime or saving lives.

Even honest liberals will tell you that millions of people, in the United States
alone, use guns to defend themselves every year - far more than the number
of people who use guns to commit violent crimes.

One does not have to be a member of a militia group to see that gun
control only leaves people at the mercy of thugs and dictators. You can
cling to the fantasy that gun control works, contrary to all reason and despite
all evidence to the contrary, but it has been demonstrated time and again to
be a universal failure. It is, frankly, foolish and immoral.

Scott McPherson is a policy adviser at the Future of Freedom Foundation.

Thursday, November 22, 2007

Al Sharpton and the so-called spike In "Hate Crimes"

Racial Bias

In 2005, law enforcement agencies reported that 4,691
hate crime
offenses were racially motivated.

Racial Bias

In 2006, law enforcement agencies reported that 4,737
single-bias hate crime offenses were racially motivated.

*2007 not available

A whopping surge of 46 since 2005-2006!

Go to and see for yourself

Race Huckster and Leftist Favorite:
The Anti-White pig Al Sharpton.

Al Sharpton Is an Anti-White Pig, He hate Whites and
wants more persecuted. This piece of trash will not
rest until "Hate Crime" persecutions against Whites
Increase for the sake of Increasing. The media If
they had any sense would Ignore Sharpton(But
we all know the media adores Anti-White
swine). What credibility does he have ? Especially after
every White male In New York was accused of raping
Tawana Brawley. It turned out that the rape was
a hoax, cooked up by a lying teenage whore. Hoping
to escape punishment by her parents being out all
night. But not before bigmouth Al created another
race card sideshow.

And Al you should watch what you wish for. You
want "Hate Crime " persecutions to be more
vigilant. But do you recall Crown Heights ?
Your Comments In the Freddie's Fashion
Mart Fiasco ? Your comments at
Kean College ? By your own definition
you are a "Hate Criminal", but you Damn
well know you can hide behind your skin color. As
long as the White elitist liberals who adore you
protect you. But In the end all men reap what
they sow. And A hypocrite like Al could end
up a "Hate Criminal" one day too, Just keep
on fighting for free speech censorship Al. One
day you could be silenced and Imprisoned as well.

Al Sharpton's famous Anti-White and
Jewish moments: This Is hate speech
and "Hate Crimes" by Al's and the
Lefts own definition. But as we see
Al gets a pass because he's black.

Crown Heights Riot

The Crown Heights Riot began on August 19, 1991, after a
car, part of a procession led by an unmarked police car, fell
behind the rest of the motorcade and sped through a red
light to catch up. The car, whose driver was Jewish, was
struck by another vehicle and ran onto the sidewalk, where
it struck and killed a seven-year-old Guyanese boy named
Gavin Cato and severely injured his cousin Angela. One of
the factors that sparked the riot was the arrival of a
private ambulance which, on the orders of a police
officer worried for the Jewish driver's safety, removed
the uninjured driver from the scene while Cato lay pinned
under his car.[41] Cato and his cousin were treated soon
after by a city ambulance. Caribbean-American and
African-American residents of the neighborhood rioted
for four consecutive days fueled by rumors that the
private ambulance had refused to treat Cato.[41][42]
During the riot blacks looted stores,[41] beat Jews in
the street,[41] and clashed with groups of Jews, hurling
rocks and bottles at one another [43] after Yankel
Rosenbaum, a visiting student from Australia, was
stabbed and killed by a member of a mob shouting
"Kill the Jew."[44] Sharpton, who arranged a rally
Crown Heights after Cato's death,[41] has been
by some commentators as inflaming tensions
by making
remarks that included "If the Jews want
to get it on,
tell them to pin their yarmulkes back and
come over to
my house"[45] and referring to Jews as

Freddie's Fashion Mart

Sharpton told the protesters, "We will not stand by
and allow them to move this brother so that some white
interloper can expand his business."

Kean College

Sharpton was quoted as saying to an audience at
Kean College
in 1994 that, “White folks was in caves
while we was building
empires ... We taught philosophy
and astrology and mathematics
before Socrates and
them Greek homos ever got around to

Tuesday, November 20, 2007

Third World U.S.A.



Posted By: billym <Send E-Mail>
Date: Tuesday, 20 November 2007, 3:30 a.m.

Are Americans Prepared to be a
Third World Country?

How do we prepare for the future now? It seems as if the
collective karma of America is about to catch up to the People and
I wonder how many are prepared to face a sudden and devastating
lowering of their standard of living
. Are we a nation of spoiled brats
whose minds will go completely to pieces when reduced to
poverty, joblessness, perhaps homelessness?
Who is strong
enough among us to adjust to overnight to a lifestyle reminiscent of
the great depression era? Everyone is now talking of such an economic
collapse because the nation is going bankrupt, because the leaders
are criminals
, because the corporations control the government for
greed, because we waste what we have (borrowed) in an unending
pointless war and the destruction of several nations.

Karma, the word, means "action" in sanskrit, it means
," with a hidden implied meaning that actions have
reactions, results, or in modern lingo "what goes around comes
around." If you hurt someone, you might yourself be hurt in
the future
. The law of karma: your actions balance out in the end.

Full Article:

The End of America ' a couple of years away' !


North American Union 'a couple years away'
Bilderberg author who 1st exposed plot in 1996 sees
EU replication as imminent
Posted: November 19, 2007
10:00 p.m. Eastern

© 2007

WASHINGTON – The next giant step toward world government
will be integration of the U.S., Canada and Mexico in European
Union-style merger in the next few years, says the author of a
best-selling book on the power of shadowy international
organizations promoting the move.

"I would say [it's just] a couple of years away," reports
Daniel Estulin, author of "The True Story of the
Bilderberg Group."

Estulin, a Canadian now living in Europe, says the original
plans for a North American Union involved the U.S. and
Canada as the prime participants. It was motivated
primarily by the desire to harvest Canada's abundant
natural resources.

In his new book, Estulin reveals the first efforts in this
plan date back to 1996 when the elite Bilderberg Group
first discussed plans for the dismantlement of Canada as
an independent nation and proposed its merger – minus
Quebec – with the United States into a Greater
North America.

"Actually, the North American Union, or rather a Canada-U.S.
merger, was initially discussed shortly after the Reagan-Bush
candidacy won the White House," he says in an interview with
WND. "Upon taking over the reins of the country, George
Bush and Ronald Reagan called in the presidents of the key
trans-national companies and asked them for the real
picture. The money people told them that if the United
States were a corporation it would have to be shut down
immediately. It was bankrupt."

The solution proposed then, according to Estulin, was
merger between the U.S. and Canada.

"Canada is virgin country with a multitude of natural
resources, water, mines, oil, gas, etc.," he explains. "They
decided that it was going to take 14 or 15 years to put the
whole project together. In the interval, the economies, social
programs and laws of the two countries would be quietly
harmonized as much as possible."

Back then, part of that harmonization plan involved the
separation of Quebec as an independent state, he says.

"Actually, when all is said and done, it all comes down to
money," Estulin says. "Money makes its own rules. If your
goal is to make the most money possible using Canada's
natural resources, what would you ask for? Number
one, give me control over the sun. Number two, give
me control over the air. Number three, give me control
over water. Now, we know we cannot control the sun, nor
can we control the air. But we can control water. Water, after
all, is the most important element that can be controlled."

But the plot for a North American Union, as exposed in detail
in Jerome Corsi's new bestselling book, "The Late Great USA," is
but a prelude, Estulin says, to the ultimate merger –
one-world government.

"Everything is in place," he says. "Europe is now one
country, one currency and one constitution. North America
is about to become one. The African Union has had its working
model going for over a decade. Asia is openly discussing the
near-future Asian Union, being sold to us as an economic
inevitability beneficial to all its citizens."

Estulin sees the current focus in the U.S. on the presidential
election of 2008 as something of a farce in light of this trend.

"Does it really matter who wins?" he asks. "As I make very
clear in 'The True Story of the Bilderberg Group,' every politician
of note and promise belongs to the Bilderbergers, CFR (Council
on Foreign Relations) or the Trilateral Commission.
Unless you
are one of them, you can hardly hope to win the presidency. If
we vote for the lesser evil, forced upon us by the secret
oligarchies and the powerful men behind the curtain, we end
up playing the game imposed upon us by them. Democracy, I
guess what I really want to say, is a fallacy, an unattainable
dream, a useless label trotted out and dusted off by the rulers
every four years for the benefit of the great unwashed – us. There
are two sides in this equation – the powerful elite who control
the world's wealth and the rest of humanity."

Estulin "guarantees" today's Republican front-runner Rudy
Giuliani will not get the nomination of his party. With less
certitude, he speculates the current mayor of New York, Michael
Bloomberg, could still be positioned to head the GOP ticket.

"Bloomberg, according to my sources within Bilderberg, will
emerge as a credible candidate of consensus for the discredited
American political establishment, your virtual "People's Choice"
candidate," he says.

What is the agenda behind these groups, which Estulin says are
comprised of "self-interested elitists protecting their wealth and
the investments of multinational banks and corporations in the
growing world economy at the expense of developing nations
and Third World countries"?

"The policies they develop," he writes, "benefit them as well a
s move us towards a one-world government."

Those questioning Estulin's conclusion as mere speculation
need only recall organizational financer David Rockefeller's own
words as recorded in his "Memoirs."

"Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best
interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as
'internationalists' and conspiring with others around the world to
build a more integrated global political and economic structure – one
world, if you will," he wrote. "If that's the charge, I stand guilty, and
I am proud of it."

Estulin's book, first written in 2005 in Spain, has been
translated into 24 languages, most recently this English
He has covered the Bilderberg Group as a journalist
for more than 15 years.

Why does he singularly devote so much attention to
exposing their activities?

"They cannot survive the light, and they know it," he says. "This
is why the powerful people have long insulated themselves
from that possibility. You see, the greatest form of control is
when you think you are free while you are being manipulated
and dictated to. People have been disarmed through the greatest
hypnotist the world has ever known – the oblong box almost
everyone has in the corner of their living rooms known as the television. By
persuading ordinary people that what they can see with their
eyes is what is there to see, the men behind the curtain have
ensured their own survival, because people will laugh in your
face when you explain to them that there is a bigger picture
they are not seeing."

What is his personal prescription for fighting back? He
offers a five-point program:

1. Understanding that governments do not represent
the people nor have their best interests at heart.

2. Understanding that corporate media's main job is to
hide the transgressions of the most powerful people in the
world not shine the light of truth on it.

3. Understanding that the corporate media forms part
of the world's elite societies such as the Bilderbergers,
the CFR and the Trilateral Commission.

4. Understanding how money works and how
through intelligent use of money we can destroy the
Bilderbergers of this world.

5. Getting out of debt now.

Monday, November 19, 2007

A must read for Anti gun freaks.

Gun Control’s Nazi Connection!


Are you tired of being told that “gun control” is a chronic pain
that you have to accept because there’s no cure? Do you — a law
abiding person — want to be free: to own whichever firearms you
want to own, regardless of where in America you live; from waiting
periods, gun bans, magazine capacity restrictions, etc.; to spend
your time on the range or in the field, rather than fighting
“gun control”?

Are you tired of giving hard earned bucks to efforts that have
at best only slowed the gun grabbers’ push toward firearms
registration and confiscation? If you have had enough of death
by a thousand cuts, you are ready to take action to wipe out
“gun control” — now.

Members of Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership
(JPFO) consider “gun control” to be an aggressive cancer. JPFO
has a cure, a way to destroy “gun control”. JPFO has hard
evidence that shows that the Nazi Weapons Law (March 18, 1938)
is the source of the U.S Gun Control Act of 1968 (GCA ‘68). Adolph
Hitler signed the Nazi Weapons Law. The Gestapo (Nazi National
Secret Police) enforced it. In “Gun Control”: Gateway to Tyranny
we present the official German text of the Nazi Weapons Law and
a side-by-side translation into English. Even more deadly: a side-by
-side, section-by-section comparison of the GCA ‘68 with the Nazi
Weapons Law. If you have this in your hands, no one can tell you
that you’re imagining things.

The clincher: JPFO knows who implanted into American law
cancerous ideas from the Nazi Weapons Law.

The likely culprit is a former senator, now deceased. We have
documentary proof — see below — that he had the original text
of the Nazi Weapons Law in his possession 4 months before the
bill that became GCA ‘68 was signed into law.

This former senator was a senior member of the U.S. team that
helped to prosecute Nazi war criminals at Nuremberg, Germany, in
1945-46. That is probably where he found out about the Nazi
Weapons Law. He may have gotten a copy of it then, or at a later
date. We cannot imagine why any U.S. lawmaker would own original
texts of Nazi laws. To find out his name, read on.

With this hard evidence in your hands and in your head, you can
destroy cancerous “gun control”. You can challenge anyone who
backs “gun control”. You can show them the Nazi ideas, line by line.

The parallels between the Nazi law and GCA ‘68 will leap at you
from the page. For example, law abiding firearm owners in
Illinois, Massachusetts and New Jersey must carry identification
cards based on formats from the Nazi Weapons Law. Nazi based
laws have no place in America. Thousands of Americans died or
were wounded in the war to wipe out the Nazis. They did not
suffer or die so that Hitler’s ideas could live on in America and
kill more Americans. Remember Killeen, Texas! The 23 who
died in Luby’s Cafeteria there died because they obeyed Nazi
inspired “gun control” laws. The law forced them, unarmed, to
face an armed madman.

To destroy “gun control” before more law abiding Americans
are murdered by criminals or madmen helped by “gun control”, you
need to get hold of the evidence as presented in “Gun Control”:
Gateway to Tyranny. You can then challenge the media, the most
aggressive backers of “gun control”. Ask media personalities in your
city or town why they back Nazi based laws. You can help to erase
“gun control”, Hitler’s last legacy.

GCA ‘68 puts your life at risk right now. You have a constitutional
civil right to be armed in order to protect yourself, because under
U.S law the police have no duty to protect the average person:

“There is no constitutional right to be protected by the state
(or Federal) against being murdered by criminals or
madmen. It is monstrous if the state fails to protect its
residents against such predators but it does not violate
the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment,
or, we suppose, any other provision of the Constitution. The
Constitution is a charter of negative liberties: it tells the state
(gov’t) to let people alone; it does not require the federal
government or the state to provide services, even so
elementary a service as maintaining law and order”
(Bowers v. DeVito, U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit,
686F.2d 616 [1982]).

The Supreme Court last dealt with this issue in 1856; the
1982 decision states the position in modern language. The
laws of virtually every state parallel federal law (see JPFO
Special Report Dial 911 and Die! covered in Guns & Ammo,
July 1992). This has been so ever since the Constitution
was adopted in 1791. As a result, the framers of the Second
Amendment deliberately created (guaranteed) an individual
civil right to be armed. It is your only reliable defense against
criminals. GCA ‘68 ties your hands and keeps you from
carrying out your legal duty to ensure your own self
defense. GCA ‘68 thus undermines a pillar of U.S. law and
helps criminals to kill law abiding Americans. Hitler would
be pleased.

Thus, GCA ‘68 marked a new approach to “gun control”. It
replaced the Federal Firearms Act (June 30, 1938), which
was based on the federal power to regulate interstate
commerce. The 1938 law required firearms dealers to get
a federal license (which then cost $1). Only dealers could ship
firearms across state lines. Ordinary people could receive
shipments from dealers.

In GCA ‘68 the government required that in almost all cases
only dealers could send and receive firearms across state
lines. This ended “mail order” sales of firearms by law abiding
persons who are not licensed dealers. GCA ‘68 hits you even
harder. Congress gave federal bureaucrats in Washington D.C.,
the power to decide what kinds of firearms you can own. The
framers of GCA ‘68 borrowed an idea — that certain firearms
are “hunting weapons” — from the Nazi Weapons Law (Section
21 and Section 32 of the Regulations, page 61 and page 73,
respectively, of “Gun Control”: Gateway to Tyranny). The
equivalent U.S. term, “sporting purpose,” was used to classify
firearms. But it was not defined anywhere in GCA ‘68. Thus,
bureaucrats were empowered to ban whole classes of
firearms. They have, in fact, done so.

We wanted to know the source of these new ideas. On reading
“Dial 911 and Die!” a JPFO member told us he had seen an
article — by Alan Stang in ‘Review of the News,’ October 4, 1967
(pages 15-20) — the author of which felt that the Nazi Weapons
Law was the model for GCA ‘68. We found the article. But Stang
did not reproduce the Nazi law, so we could not check his conclusions.

We started to hunt for the text of the Nazi Weapons Law. We
eventually found it, in the law library of an Ivy League university.

Until 1943-44, the German government published its laws and
regulations in the ‘Reichsgesetzblatt,’ roughly the equivalent of
the U.S. Federal Register. Carefully shelved by law librarians, the
1938 issues of this German government publication had gathered
a lot of dust. In the ‘Reichsgesetzblatt’ issue for the week of March
21, 1938, was the official text of the Weapons Law (March 18,
1938). It gave Hitler’s Nazi party a stranglehold on the Germans,
many of whom did not support the Nazis. We found that the Nazis
did not invent “gun control” in Germany. The Nazis inherited gun
control and then perfected it: they invented handgun control.

The Nazi Weapons Law of 1938 replaced a Law on Firearms and
Ammunition of April 13, 1928. The 1928 law was enacted by a
center-right, freely elected German government that wanted to
curb “gang activity,” violent street fights between Nazi party and
Communist party thugs. All firearm owners and their firearms had
to be registered. Sound familiar? “Gun control” did not save
democracy in Germany. It helped to make sure that the
toughest criminals, the Nazis, prevailed.

The Nazis inherited lists of firearm owners and their firearms when
they ‘lawfully’ took over in March 1933. The Nazis used these
inherited registration lists to seize privately held firearms from
persons who were not “reliable.” Knowing exactly who owned
which firearms, the Nazis had only to revoke the annual ownership
permits or decline to renew them.

In 1938, five years after taking power, the Nazis enhanced the
1928 law. The Nazi Weapons Law introduced handgun
control. Firearms ownership was restricted to Nazi party
members and other “reliable” people.

The 1938 Nazi law barred Jews from businesses involving
firearms. On November 10. 1938 — one day after the Nazi
party terror squads (the SS) savaged thousands of Jews,
synagogues and Jewish businesses throughout Germany —
new regulations under the Weapons Law specifically barred
Jews from owning any weapons, even clubs or knives.

Given the parallels between the Nazi Weapons Law and the
GCA ‘68, we concluded that the framers of the GCA ‘68 —
lacking any basis in American law to sharply cut back the
civil rights of law abiding Americans — drew on the Nazi
Weapons Law of 1938.

Finding the Nazi Weapons Law whetted our appetite. We
wanted to know who implanted this Nazi cancer in
America. We began by probing the backgrounds of
lawmakers who championed “gun control”. We focused
on those whose bills became part of GCA ‘68. GCA ‘68 as
enacted closely tracks proposals dating to August
1963. We felt that if the culprit were a lawmaker —
or a congressional staffer — he or she would know
Germany, German law and possibly even speak
German. He or she probably would have spent time in
Germany on business or during military service. Alternatively,
if the culprit were not a member of Congress or a staffer, there
would be testimony at the hearings to that effect.

Most potential suspects were quickly eliminated; they had
no apparent ties to Germany. But one lawmaker caught our attention.

An old “Who’s Who” entry showed he had been a senior member
of the U.S. team that prosecuted German war criminals at Nuremberg
in 1945-46. Thus, he had lived in Germany just after the Nazi
period. His official duties required him to look at Nazi records, including
Nazi laws. In 1963 he led the effort to greatly expand the Federal
Firearms Act of 1938.

We then got a break. We told a legal scholar of our findings. He was
intrigued. He sent us an extract from the record of hearings held a
few months prior to the enactment of GCA ‘68. At the end of June
1968, the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee to investigate Juvenile
Delinquency — chaired by Thomas J. Dodd (D-CT) — held hearings
on bills: (1) “To Require the Registration of Firearms” (S.3604).
(2) “To Disarm Lawless Persons” (S.3634) and (3) “To Provide for
the Establishment of a National Firearms Registry” (S.3637),
among others.

U.S. Representative John Dingell (D-MI) testified at these Senate
hearings on “gun control”. Senator Joseph D. Tydings (D-MD) chaired
some of these hearings, in Dodd’s absence.

Rep. Dingell expressed concern that if firearms registration were
required, it might lead to confiscation of firearms, as had happened
in Nazi Germany. Tydings angrily accused Rep. Dingell of using
“scare tactics”:

“Are you inferring that our system here, gun registration or licensing,
would in any way be comparable to the Nazi regime in Germany, where
they had a secret police, and a complete takeover?”

Rep. Dingell backed away.

(Hearings before the Subcommittee to Investigate Juvenile Delinquency
of the Committee on the Judiciary, 90th Congress, 2nd Session, June 26,
27 and 28 and July 8, 9 and 10. 1968, pp. 479-80, 505-6 cited as
Subcommittee Hearings.)

Tydings later inserted into the hearing record various documents,
“concerning the history of Nazism and gun confiscation.”

Exhibit No. 62 (see reproduction) is fascinating. This letter — dated
July 12, 1968 — is to Subcommittee Chairman Dodd from Lewis C.
Coffin, Law Librarian at the Library of Congress. Coffin wrote:

” … we are enclosing herewith a translation of the Law on Weapons
of March 18, 1938, prepared by Dr. William Solyom-Fekete of
[the European Law Division — ed.] as well as the Xerox of the
original German text which you supplied” (Subcommittee
Hearings, p. 489, emphasis added).

This letter makes it public knowledge that at the end of June
1968 — 4 months before GCA ‘68 was enacted — Senator
Thomas J. Dodd, now deceased, personally owned a copy
of the original German text of the Nazi Weapons Law.

Why did Dodd own the original German text of any
Nazi law? Why did he make known that he owned it?

The Library of Congress then had (and still has) the
‘Reichsgesetzblatt’ in its collection. The Library of Congress
translator, Dr. Solyom-Fekete, could easily have used the
Library of Congress’ own copy.

Any member of Congress who wanted to read the Nazi
Weapons Law need only have asked for it to be produced
from the shelves of the Library of Congress and for it to
be translated by Library of Congress experts. Why should
any member of Congress ever have owned the original
German text of the Nazi Weapons Law?

Without access to Tom Dodd’s personal papers, archived
under his heirs’ control, we unfortunately cannot offer
definite answers.

Dodd could have acquired the German text of the
Nazi Weapons Law during his time at Nuremberg. But
he had no need to do so.

Dodd did not personally handle the prosecution of Nazi
Interior Minister Wilhelm Frick, who signed the Nazi
Weapons Law. The case against Frick was presented
by Robert M.W. Kempner, Assistant Trial Counsel for
the United States (see ‘Trial of the Major War Criminals
before the International Military Tribunal,’ cited as
TMWC, Vol. V, pp. 352-67, Nuremberg, Germany, 1947).

Nor should the Nazi Weapons Law otherwise have come to
Dodd’s attention. The Nazi Weapons Law was not used as
evidence against Frick (see Kempner’s speech, TMWC,
V, pp. 352-67 and ‘Index of Laws, Decrees, Orders,
Directives, and the Administration of Justice in Nazi
Germany and Nazi Dominated Countries’, TMWC,
Vol. XXIII, pp. 430-33). The Nazi Weapons Law is
not listed among documents submitted as evidence
to the Tribunal by the American prosecutors
(see Vol. XXIV, pp. 98-169).

The prosecutors at Nuremberg doubtless knew of the
Nazi Weapons Law. They probably saw it in the
‘Reichsgesetzblatt.’ On the same day that Nazi Interior
Minister Frick signed the Weapons Law, March 18, 1938,
he signed another law governing security measures in
newly annexed Austria. This law concerning Austria
appeared in the ‘Reichsgesetzblatt’ — directly in front
of the Weapons Law — and was introduced into evidence
at Nuremberg (’Reichsgesetzblatt’ 1938, I, p. 262; the
Nazi Weapons Law was published in the same volume,
p. 265; see TMWC, Vol. V, p.358 for reference to law
concerning Austria).

Thus, the Nazi Weapons Law appeared to have no historical
merit at Nuremberg and should not have attracted anyone’s
notice, certainly not to the extent of causing anyone to want
o keep a copy of it as a separate document.

If Dodd got his copy of the original German text of the Nazi
Weapons Law during his time at Nuremberg, it likely was
part of a collection of documents, for example, issues of the

But if he acquired the original German text of the Nazi Weapons
Law after his service at Nuremberg, he must have done so for a
very specific reason. The Nazi Weapons Law plainly did not
figure at Nuremberg.

We may safely conclude it had little, if any, interest for those
interested in the history of the Nazis’ rise to power. For example,
the Nazi Weapons Law is not mentioned at all in William L. Shirer’s
very thorough study of Nazi Germany, ‘The Rise and Fall of the
Third Reich’ (Simon and Schuster, New York, 1950).

At the hearings held by Dodd’s subcommittee at the end of
June 1968, Rep. Dingell had objected to the firearms registration
provision then being discussed. Dodd may have offered his copy
of the Nazi Weapons Law to show that the specific proposal did
not resemble anything in the Nazi law.

He may not have realized that he was revealing a broader
truth; that the whole fabric of GCA ‘68 was based on the
Nazi Weapons Law, even if the specific registration proposal
was not so based.

Alternatively, Dodd may not have cared whether or not
anyone knew that he had the German text of the Nazi Weapons
Law. He doubtless knew that months would pass before the
hearing record was printed and so generally available for
scrutiny. Thus, even if anyone then noticed the parallels
between the two laws, the bill would already have become law.

Rep. Dingell does not appear to have pursued the matter: the
firearms registration provision was not included in GCA ‘68.
The Congress was stampeded on “gun control” by public
enthusiasm. Martin Luther King had been murdered on April 4,
1968, and Robert F. Kennedy had been murdered on June 6, 1968.

We are not the first to have seen this hearing record. But we
appear to be the first to have recognized its importance. This
hearing record suggests strongly that the late Senator
Thomas J. Dodd (D-CT) himself implanted the Nazi Weapons
Law into American law, or, at very least, helped others to do so.

Now you know the ugly truth about the roots of GCA ‘68. But
you need to see — with your own eyes — the hard evidence of
the Nazi roots of “gun control” in America presented in “Gun
Control”: Gateway to Tyranny.

If you want to destroy “gun control”, you can use this book
to do it.

The Nazi Weapons Law of March 18, 1938, cleared the way
for World War II and Nazi genocide against the Jews, Gypsies and
7,000,000 other people.

Quotes from Zionist Presidential appointee hopeful Hillary.


Hat Tip to Earl1911 for finding these!

Where is the G-damn f**king flag? I want the G-damn f**king flag
up every f**king morning at f**king sunrise.” (From the book “Inside
The White House” by Ronald Kessler, p. 244 - Hillary to the staff
at the Arkansas Governor’s mansion on Labor Day, 1991)

“You sold out, you mother f**ker! You sold out!” (From the book
“Inside” by Joseph Califano, p. 213 - Hillary yelling at
Democrat lawyer.)

“It’s been said, and I think it’s accurate, that my husband
was obsessed by terrorism in general and al-Qaida in particular.”
Hillary telling a post-9/11 world what a ‘great’ commander in
chief her husband was; Dateline, NBC 4/16/2004.)

“I have to admit that a good deal of what my husband and
I have learned [about Islam] has come from our daughter.”
( 8/8/1999 - Hillary at a White House
function, proudly tells some Muslim groups she is gaining a
greater appreciation of Islam because Chelsea was then taking
a class on the “religion of peace”)

F**k off! It’s enough that I have to see you shit-kickers every
day, I’m not going to talk to you too!! Just do your G*damn
job and keep your mouth shut.” (From the book “American
Evita” by Christopher Anderson, p. 90 - Hillary to her State
Trooper bodyguards after one of them greeted her with
“Good morning.”

“You f**king idiot.” (From the book “Crossfire” p. 84 - Hillary
to a State Trooper who was driving her to an event.)

“If you want to remain on this detail, get your f**king ass over
here and grab those bags!” (From the book “The First Partner”
p. 259 - Hillary to a Secret Service Agent who was reluctant to
carry her luggage because he wanted to keep his hands free in
case of an incident.)

“Get f**ked! Get the f**k out of my way!!! Get out of my face!!!”
(From the book “Hillary’s Scheme” p. 89 - Hillary’s various
comments to her Secret Service detail agents.)

“Stay the f**k back, stay the f**k away from me! Don’t come
within ten yards of me, or else! Just f**king do as I s ay, Okay!!!?”
(From the book “Unlimited Access”, by Clinton FBI Agent in
Charge, Gary Aldrige, p. 139 - Hillary screaming at her
Secret Service detail.)

“Many of you are well enough off that [President Bush’s] tax
cuts may have helped you. We’re saying that for America to
get back on track, we’re probably going to cut that short and
not give it to you. We’re going to have to take things away
from you on behalf of the common good.” (Hillary
grandstanding at a fund raising speech in San Francisco; 6/28/2004.)

“Why do I have to keep proving to people that I am not a liar?!”
(From the book “The Survivor,” by John Harris, p. 382 - Hillary
in her 2000 Senate campaign)

“Where’s the miserable c*ck sucker?” (From the book “The
Truth About Hillary” by Edward Klein, p. 5 - Hillary shouting
at a Secret Service officer)

“No matter what you think about the Iraq war, there is one
thing we can all agree on for the next days - we have to salute
the courage and bravery of those who are risking their lives to
vote and those brave Iraqi and American soldiers fighting to
protect their right to vote.” (Was posted on Hillary Clinton’s web site on 1/28/05)

“Put this on the ground! I left my sunglasses in the limo. I
need those sunglasses. We need to go back!” (From the book
“Dereliction of Duty” p. 71-72 - Hillary to Marine One helicopter
pilot to turn back while en route to Air Force One.)

A right-wing network was after his presidency…including
perverting the Constitution.” (To Barbara Walters about
the Republicans who impeached her husband; 20/20,
ABC 6/8/2003.)

“What are you doing inviting these people into my home?
These people are our enemies! They are trying to destroy us!”
(From the book “The Survivor” by John Harris, p. 99 - Hillary
screaming to an aide, when she found out that some Republicans
had been invited to the White House)

“I mean, you’ve got a conservative and right-wing press
presence with really nothing on the other end of the political
spectrum.” (C-Span, 1/19/1997 - Hillary complains about
the mainstream media, which are all conservatives in her opinion)

“Come on Bill, put your dick up! You can’t f**k her here!!”
(From the book “Inside The White House” by Ronald Kessler,
p. 243 - Hillary to Gov. Clinton when she spots him talking
with an attractive female at an Arkansas political rally)

“You know, I’m going to start thanking the woman who
cleans the restroom in the building I work in. I’m going to
start thinking of her as a human being” (From the book “The
Case Against Hillary Clinton” by Peggy Noonan, p. 55)

“You show people what you’re willing to fight for when you
fight your friends.” (From the book “The Agenda” by
Bob Woodward, ch. 14)

“We are at a stage in history in which remolding society
is one of the great challenges facing all of us in the West.”
(From the book “I’ve Always Been A Yankee Fan” by Thomas
D. Kuiper, p 119 - During her 1993 commencement address
at the University of Texas)

“The only way to make a difference is to acquire power”
(From the book “I’ve Always Been A Yankee Fan” by
Thomas D. Kuiper, p 68 - Hillary to a friend before
starting law school.)

“We just can’t trust the American people to make those
types of choices…. Government has to make those choices
for people” (From the book “I’ve Always Been A Yankee
Fan” by Thomas D. Kuiper, p 20 - Hillary to Rep. Dennis
Hastert in 1993 discussing her expensive, disastrous
taxpayer-funded health care plan)

“I am a fan of the social policies that you find in Europe”
(From the book “I’ve Always Been A Yankee Fan” by
Thomas D. Kuiper, p. 76 - Hillary in 1996)

Hat Tip Joe