Monday, February 25, 2008

Male Hating Western Fe-Manist Women

Typical Liberal hypocrite ! Fe-Manist and Male
hating Jewess Gloria Steinem dressed as a Playboy
bunny, at the New York Playboy club In 1962. I
thought Fe-Manist's were against such
things as they claimed It Is "oppressive" to Women.



by Alan Stang
February 21, 2008

In the last chapter of this series about the Womanoid Movement,
we saw that in general it says the same thing as the Communist
Manifesto. It wants chaos and Communism. But we need to nail
that conclusion down, to make sure we are not just talking about
something lifelong parasite and abuser of women Karl Marx said
more than 150 years ago; we need to see what today’s womanoids
believe. If they believe something different, it doesn’t matter
what the lifelong parasite who impregnated the family maid said.

For instance, there is Simone de Beauvoir, the French woman whose
husband was Existentialist philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre. His chef
d’oeuvre was Being and Nothingness, which is all you really need to
know about it because existentialists were “Gnostic atheists,” a
phrase I am inventing here, so you don’t need to look it up. They
weren’t absolutely certain they existed, and, sure enough, by now
they have disappeared, which probably proves they didn’t.

In The Second Sex (New York, Alfred A. Knopf, 1993), Simone de
Beauvoir wrote as follows: “A world where men and women would
be equal is easy to visualize, for that precisely is what the Soviet
Revolution promised . . .” (p. 760) And that was what she
wanted. We have already dispatched at length the preposterous
notion that the sexes could be equal.

Simone de Beauvoir told Saturday Review this (June 14, 1974,
p. 18): "No woman should be authorized to stay at home to raise
her children. Society should be totally different. Women should
not have that choice, precisely because if there is such
choice, too many women will make that one."

Let that sink in, ladies. Simone de Beauvoir, whom today’s
womanoids everywhere worship, says women should not be
allowed to stay home. She says they should be driven out by
force. They shouldn’t be allowed to choose, because, she knows,
they would choose home. Freedom of choice is not an option.

She doesn’t believe in freedom because she is a Marxist. So we’re
not talking about “liberating” women; we’re not talking about
enlarging opportunities for women, about shattering the “glass
ceiling.” We’re talking about the opposite, about Marx’s “community
of women,” in which women would be community property, denied
privacy and choice. If women are forced out of their homes, by the
government – which alone could do so – that is what you would have.

Gloria Steinem, Editor of Ms. magazine, a prominent American
womanoid, is the author of the dazzlingly clever remark, “A woman
needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle.” Later, she got married, and
the big surprise was – to a man. Gloria also said, “Overthrowing
capitalism is too small for us. We must overthrow the whole
F*#@+*g patriarchy!” (Detroit Free Press, April 15, 1974) In
1977, in Houston, Gloria Steinem said, “For the sake of those
who wish to live in equal partnership, we have to abolish and
reform the institution of legal marriage.” How do you reform
something after you abolish it? Gloria did not explain.

Read more.....

No comments: