Showing posts with label Thought Police. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Thought Police. Show all posts

Wednesday, April 23, 2008

1984 Is America And European Nations Under Political Correctness

As In 1984

Freedom of speech and thought that
doesn't conform to
Zionism and the Bolshevik
leftist Is condemned. History that doesn't
meet the politically correct belief system Is
whitewashed, changed or vilified. Citizens are
punished for thought crimes.

This Is America, Canada, Australia,
New Zealand and Europe today. In these
nations, It Is 1984.


Newspeak
- The official language of Oceania. Newspeak is "politically
correct" speech taken to its maximum extent. Newspeak is based on
standard English, but all words describing "unorthodox" political
ideas have been removed. In addition, there was an attempt to
remove the overall number of words in general, to limit the
range of ideas that could be expressed.


The most important aim of newspeak was to provide a means
of speaking that required no thought what-so-ever. It uses
abbreviations or clipped conjunctions in order to mask or alter
a word's true meaning. For example, words such as Miniluv and
joycamp, allow the speaker to speak without actually being force
to think about what they were talking about.. or at least, not as
much as if they were required to use complete phrases such as
"Ministry of Love" or "Forced Labor Camp". These words just
roll right off the lips before the speaker can even contemplate
what he is really saying.


Reducing the number of words also removes any literary value
to writing, because there would only be one distinct way to present
any particular concept. It would be impossible to write a book like
Common Sense , Uncle Tom's Cabin, or even 1984 in Newspeak. Not
only would the correct words for certain concepts not be available,
but a lack of adjectives would cause the writing would be completely
bland and unemotional, which in itself would keep people from
reading at all.

blackwhite- The ability to accept whatever "truth" the party
puts out, no matter how absurd it may be. Orwell described it
as "...loyal willingness to say black is white when party discipline
demands this. It also means the ability to believe that black is
white, and more, to know black is white, and forget that one
has ever believed the contrary."

crimethink - To even consider any thought not in line with the
principles of Ingsoc. Doubting any of the principles of Ingsoc. All
crimes begin with a thought. So, if you control thought, you can
control crime. "Thoughtcrime is death. Thoughtcrime does not
entail death, Thoughtcrime is death.... The essential crime that
contains all others in itself."

facecrime - Orwell's definition : "It was terribly dangerous to
let your thoughts wander when you were in any public place or
within range of a telescreen. The smallest thing could give you
away. A nervous tic, an unconscious look of anxiety, a habit of
muttering to yourself -- anything that carried with it the suggestion
of abnormality, of having something to hide. In any case, to wear
an improper expression on your face (to look incredulous when a
victory was announced, for example) was itself a punishable
offence. There was even a word for it in Newspeak: facecrime, it
was called."

goodthinker - One who strongly adheres to all of the principles
of Newspeak. (goodthinked, goodthink, goodthinked, goodthinking,
goodthinkful, goodthinking, goodthinkful, goodthinkwise,
goodthinker
)

memory hole - A system of pipes, similar to pneumatic tubes,
which were used to destroy documents. A document stuffed in
the memory hole would be conveniently whisked away to the
furnaces below - quickly & easily wiped from history.

Oldspeak - Standard English. Newspeak is based on Oldspeak, with
all words which represent unpopular (or politically incorrect) ideas
removed

oldthink - Holding on to old ideas and patterns of thought not
consistent with current government policy (Ingsoc). Maintaining a
belief that is no longer acceptable, but was normal just a few years
prior.

oldthinkers - Those who engage in oldthink Those who have not
fully accepted the new Ingsoc way of thinking.

unperson - Person that has been erased from existence by the
government for breaking the law in some way. A unperson is
completely erased from history. All records of their existence is
removed from record, and all party members are expected to
removed them from memory. To mention their name is considered
thoughtcrime. This eliminates any possibility of martyrdom.



Saturday, April 19, 2008

Another Incident Of Anti-Christ Harrassment

Stalin would be proud of the "Politically Correct" and
Anti-Christian
society America has become. Two of the
Soviet Unions dogmas that
currently are American
government de facto policies.



Street preacher claims police harassment
'I got the distinct impression they wanted me to move'

© 2008 WorldNetDaily

A man who wants to spread the word about Jesus in his town
of Alma, Ark., says he was intimidated by officials from the local
school district as well as police officers when they approached him
on a public sidewalk and told him to find another place to preach.


Daniel Guyeski, who told WND he feels called to preach to his
community, said a vice principal from Alma High School first
warned him against speaking on the sidewalk, then two police
officers approached him and made a suggestion.


"I got the distinct impression they wanted me to move," he told
WND. He said he felt intimidated and left, instead of continuing
his gospel message.


Police officials confirmed to WND they contacted Guyeski, but that
he was on a public sidewalk and was doing nothing wrong.


Police Chief Russell White did, however, tell WND that there were
"issues" with Guyeski and his office had been contacted by a nearby
police department in Fort Smith about the preacher.


Guyeski said when police confronted him they also accused him of
having issues with a girlfriend in Fort Smith, but he explained that
that issue must concern someone else because he is married and
lives in Alma.


Guyeski told WND he was preaching on the public sidewalk across
the street of Alma High School when an assistant principal
approached him and told him to move down the road, to a location
near a fire station, and he complied.


Then, however, he told WND that officers from Alma's police
department approached him, demanded his identification and then
after the vice principal approached the group, told him, "You need to
find a better time and place to preach."

Read More.......

Another example of todays Anti-Christ perversion-

Ex-partner argues in court faith 'is harmful to children'



Monday, April 14, 2008

The Thought Police Are Watching You

Picture from www.foothilltech.org

This has already been known for a long time by those who
the sheep society Ignorantly call conspiracy nuts. How do
you sheep feel now ? Big Brother Is getting more bolder by
announcing this to all. And this country condemns China
for Internet censorship ! As more truth gets revealed, they
will begin to crackdown on the Internet more Intensely. Still
feel free ?

Tuesday, April 8, 2008

When All Crime Is A "Hate Crime " For Everyone Maybe We'll Have Equal Justice Again

'Hate Laws' Real Agenda
By Harmony Grant 4-8-8

In the UK, 7000 citizens signed their name to a petition to expand
hate crime laws. They want the laws to punish anyone who commits
violence because someone looks different. The petition responds to
the murder of a young Goth-dressing woman and her boyfriend
in a park.


The assailants didn't know the girl. Presumably they attacked
her because she was wearing black lipstick. That's how the
argument goes. The thuggish kids who attacked her should get
tripled penalties because their violence was motivated by her
weird looks.


So, it would have been less heinous had she been an upper
class, pearls-wearing babe attacked because she looked rich?
What if she'd been a gorgeous blonde cheerleader and they
attacked her because they weren't getting any? The list goes
on forever.

It is hideously unjust to label the value of various victims,
stiffening penalties for some murders and not others, for some
assaults and not others, etc. Every violent crime is a tragedy
to be redressed. Endlessly add to the list of special "hate
crime" victims, and someday everybody will be on
it. Then we'll be right back where we started: equal law.

But unjust penalties for violent crimes aren't the greatest
danger of hate crime laws. Their greatest danger is that they
criminalize free speech. They criminalize certain beliefs and
animosities-emotions with which the government has no business
meddling. The government has no more right to say you can't
be biased against homosexuals than to say you can't be biased
against professional athletes or workaholics or overbearing
mothers-in-law.


Hate crime laws were created by the Anti-Defamation League
of B'nai B'rith, a Jewish organization committed to demonizing-and
yes, defaming-beliefs and values it opposes. Specifically, the ADL
opposes anti-Israel and anti-homosexual activism and Christian
evangelism. Hate crime laws were not created primarily to
respond to violent crime (which is, obviously, already illegal). They
were created to marginalize and then criminalize certain kinds of
speech and "bias" ­ primarily Christian.
Full article -

Friday, March 28, 2008

The S.P.L.C . And "The Sleaze"

The S.P.L.C.'s Morris "The Sleaze"
Dees, brands any group who offends
him or disagrees a hate group.

S.P.L.C. SHOWING ITS TRUE COLORS

By Lynn Stuter

March 25, 2008

NewsWithViews.com


A recent article appeared in the Sierra Vista Herald newspaper
of Sierra Vista, Arizona in which Glenn Spencer of American Border
Patrol
became the target of the Southern Poverty Law Center
(SPLC). According to the SPLC, the American Border Patrol is a
“hate group.”


Going on the SPLC website, clicking on “hate map” and clicking
on Arizona, one discovers that, sure enough, there is American
Border Patrol listed as “anti-immigrant.”


There are several different definitions for the term ‘immigrant’
but generally they all agree that an immigrant is someone who
leaves his nation of birth to live in another nation permanently,
someone who is not a visitor or a tourist in the guest nation but
enters the nation legally, meeting the requirements of the
immigration laws of that nation, with the intention of becoming
a citizen of that nation, enjoying all the benefits thereof.


Going back to the SPLC website, American Border Patrol is listed
as “anti-immigrant.” Anti means against; anti-immigrant, then,
would mean an organization against allowing people to enter the
country, legally, to become citizens.


Is this a true representation of American Border Patrol? It becomes
very apparent, in a walk through of the American Border Patrol
website, that American Border Patrol has no problem with those
who enter this country legally with the intent of becoming citizens,
are legal immigrants; that the American Border Patrol only has a
problem with foreign nationals who enter the United States without
the proper papers and without the proper authorization; who are,
in fact, illegal aliens. Such entry into the United States is, by law, a
criminal act, a criminal offense. There is a great deal of difference
between a legal immigrant and an illegal immigrant or illegal alien.


But the SPLC does not list American Border Patrol as being
anti-legal-immigrant, only as anti-immigrant, leaving the reader
to believe, by omission, that the American Border Patrol is against
legal immigration. This is not true; this is, in fact, a lie. How does
SPLC respond to the obvious difference between a legal immigrant
and an illegal alien? By claiming the distinction is “hogwash.” That
the SPLC would claim this distinction is hogwash is telling, indeed.


Further search of the SPLC website lists incidents, per state, of
supposed “hate” incidents. Interestingly, not one of the incidents
listed in Arizona implicates the American Border Patrol in any way.


The SPLC claims a “commitment to racial equality.” But is that
really true?

Wednesday, March 26, 2008

The Ugly Truth About The ADL

Book Analysis
"The Synagogue Of Satan"
The ugly truth about the ADL

by ASHAHED M. MUHAMMAD

Despite its reputation as a well oiled and effective public
relations organization, many consider the Anti-Defamation
League of B’nai B’rith (ADL) to be one of the most
dangerous organizations in the world.


With a reported average annual budget of a little bit
over 48-million dollars, the ADL has often used its
considerable clout and connections to silence any voices
who dare to stand against their lobbying tactics or tacit
yet active approval of thought repression.


The ADL has repeatedly capitalized on the fact that most
Americans believe what they see and hear at face value
by conducting some of the most vile and reprehensible
smear campaigns ever.


Increasingly, with the use of the Internet many more
scandalous and shocking revelations are being made
known by individuals and organizations that care more
about the principles of truth than they do about being
labeled.


There aren’t many with in depth knowledge of the
shady formation and unsavory characters involved in
what is the modern representation of the ADL. The editors
of the Executive Intelligence Review (EIR) have delivered
a significant amount of information in a small yet
compelling book titled "The Ugly Truth About the ADL."


The San Francisco Spy Scandal in 1994 showed the public
what many of us have already known and that is that
the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith acts as a spy
organization supplying intelligence data to foreign
governments and delivering damaging information --often
fabricated or intentionally altered -- to enemies of those
deemed to be their opponents.


More often that not, the opponents of the ADL are those
who stand in defense of freedom of speech and are not
afraid to criticize the ADL’s tactics, information gathering
stratagem, or object to what we at the TEI refer to as
specious claims of anti-Semitism hurled so effectively and
indiscriminately by the ADL in defense of their selfish
economic or political interests.


The book begins with a swift yet tidy analysis of the
above-mentioned San Francisco spy scandal in which the
ADL was found to be guilty of spying on hundreds of
political, human rights and religious organizations, maintaining
files and dossiers on their organizational memberships
and leaders.


They were also said to be infiltrating countless law
enforcement agencies, bribing law enforcement officials,
and obtaining classified data on private citizens.


Far from being an isolated incident of impropriety,
further research found the ADL to be guilty of providing
information on anti-Apartheid groups to agents of the
apartheid government of South Africa possibly resulting
in the mysterious disappearance of many anti-Apartheid
activists. The same modus operandi was used to harness
Arab activism in America and abroad. Israeli authorities
have repeatedly shown their propensity for violence
through assassination of their enemies, and in some
cases, their friends, outright either by their military, or
surreptitiously through their Mossad agents and operatives.


On "Political Correctness"


"Political Correctness", I wonder why people follow this stupid
Bolshevik Invention. If you know the reality of the World, speak
up about It. Stop hiding your head In the sand, truthfully what
are you hiding for ?

Is It because you think your thoughts are truly wrong ? Or
because you are afraid of what the Commissars and their
Bolshevik PC foot soldiers may think ? Or Is It the State
Imposed Sanctions you fear for defying the "Politically
Correct " dogmas ? Why even care about being branded a
"Politically Incorrect" heretic by the mindless Leftists
anymore ?

Nothing changes by living like an ostrich. And true change
requires some risk. Common sense and truth always
triumphs over State created fantasies In the end. If It
Isn't unraveling, why are they trying so fiercely to maintain
the facade ?

Tuesday, March 25, 2008

Zionist Rat Sarkozy Offended By Minister Speaking Against Israeli Savegry

The rat King of France - Sarkozy

"Thou Shalt not criticize the sacred Zionist state of Israel"
The Zionist commandment to the goy

No Free Speech In France

It seems a minister in a local French province made an angry
comment about Israeli snipers shooting children in front of
their schools, and was quickly canned.

Bruno Guiguen Gets Sacked

A French senior civil servant has been sacked
for publishing a violent anti-Israeli diatribe on a
website, the Interior Ministry said. The article was
published on March 13 on the Oumma.com
website, which serves the Muslim community in
France. Bruno Guigue, deputy prefect of the
southwestern town of Saintes, wrote that Israel
was "the only state where snipers shoot down
little girls outside their school gates."

(Zionists and organized Jewry
will now likely shriek
Anti-semitism as
usual, they will also likely seek

Guiguen be Imprisoned. They
hate freedom of speech and the
questioning of Zionism. Why If
they're such bearers of light to the
nations they occupy?
)

Israelis Shoots Children

Over the last five years the Jewish soldiers
have killed close to 1000 children.

sarkozy_is_offended_






Saturday, March 8, 2008

Useful Idiots

These clowns were the first wave of useful Idiots. While
less well off White, American Indian,Latino, and Black kids were
fighting In Vietnam. These Jewish Anti-American Bolsheviks from
wealthy families were protesting or fleeing to Canada. They
also loved to welcome the brave soldiers who fought In
Vietnam( Many who had no choice as they were drafted)
with spit and chants of baby killer.

Sure this position will be met with the familiar cries
of Anti-Semitism, And will be decried by
the PC Commissars. But who the hell
cares, It Is the unabashed truth . PC
dogmas only want you to believe In lies, how
long until you PC followers open your eyes and seek
the truth ? You will never find It If you
are Politically Correct, and afraid to ask
questions. Wouldn't you desire to be free ? you
are not free If you must self censor your speech.

It Is better to be free and willing to walk alone, rather
than have the companionship and shackles of slaves.

Jewish role In the 1960's counterculture and new Left

1960's Jewish Bolshevik radicals, now worshiped as cultural
heroes by the Left.
Jewish Bolshevik Abbie Hoffman In all of his
degenerate"glory".
Useful Idiots protesting at the direction of their
Bolshevik handlers.
Funny how they worship Communist leaders, yet these same
leaders would Imprison them for daring to protest. Josef Stalin
or Mao would not tolerate these protests one bit !

They condemn Fascism, yet see nothing wrong with
supporting an Ideology that was responsible
for 100 million deaths ! Communism.


But these self-righteous hypocrites could
careless, or In most case are Ignorant to the
facts of Bolshevism. Most only follow
"what Is the cool cause" fed to them
by their university professors and the media.

That Is why the American educational system
and media like a dumbed down populace, they
make the perfect useful Idiots. They follow
rather than lead, they never think for
themselves, so they will never question the
party line.


Useful Idiots
by John Otis
January 2006 Voice of the Real America No. 222

Political correctness, perceived by many as a silly, ineffective
shield meant to protect minorities from chauvinistic Western
Man, is more accurately a deadly noose around the neck of the
entire Western Gentile civilization. Gentiles who engage in PC
are being “useful idiots,” as they assist their enemies whose
primary goal is to totally wipe them out. Would a utopian world
order prevent this from happening? Not when the world order
planners define “utopia” as a place where Western Gentile
civilization no longer exists. It is commonly believed that the
benefits, and indeed the purpose of a world order is to prevent
nations from warring against each other so as to bring
peace, prosperity, freedom and harmony to the world. How
nice. The historical facts are in total variance. For hundreds
of years, the same alliance, its descendants and allies – the
prime aspirants who would control the world order – have
also been the prime instigators of multi-millions of deaths
and all the major wars. They regard these conflicts to be of
such importance that, after setting them up, they often fund
not just one but also the opposing forces. The logic behind this
fact is linked to the same reason that political leaders seem
to unreasonably never learn from history. In other words –
many so-called “downfalls,” passed off as unintended
consequences have been deliberately planned. Why? Because
perpetual rule by the same alliance of power-elites requires
“insurgencies” which must be financed. Revolutions generate
blinded loyalists – or, “useful idiots,” of whom the increasingly
greater part of the elite-controlled multitudes are comprised. The
more “useful idiots” there are, the more powerful the alliance
becomes, ensuring its continuous, ever-intensifying control. It
costs money, lots of money, to organize and manipulate
“successful” rebellions. The Russian proletariat did not
suddenly rise up in mob-like fury against the czars, as some
pedagogues would have their students believe. The Bolshevik
Revolution was plotted. It was in the works for years and fueled
by the heirs, and some allies, of the Rothschild financial empire.
http://i.am/jah/freedman.htm


The Rockefeller financial empire, a subsidiary of, although dwarfed
by, the House of Rothschild, was (is) part of the alliance. The
following are excerpts from the book “Murder by Injection”
by Eustace Mullins, chapter 10: “The involvement of the
Rockefellers in promoting the world Communist Revolution also
developed from their business interests. . . Congressional
testimony revealed that [John D.] Rockefeller had sent large
sums to Lenin and Trotsky to instigate the Communist Revolution
of 1905. His banker, Jacob Schiff [agent of the House of
Rothschild]. . . had sent a personal emissary, George Kennan, to
Russia to spend some twenty years in promoting revolutionary
activity against the Czar. “When the Czar abdicated, Trotsky was
placed on a ship with three hundred Communist revolutionaries
from the Lower East Side of New York. Rockefeller obtained a
special passport for Trotsky from Woodrow Wilson and sent
Lincoln Steffens with him to make sure he was returned safely
to Russia. For travelling expenses, Rockefeller placed a purse
containing $10,000 in Trotsky’s pocket. . . Although
Communism, like other isms, had originated with Marx’s
association with the House of Rothschild, it enlisted the reverent
support of John D. Rockefeller because he saw Communism for
what it is, the ultimate monopoly, not only controlling the
government, the monetary system and all property, but also
a monopoly which, like the corporation it emulates, is
self-perpetuating and eternal.” But, there have been
temporary setbacks, as follows. After Lenin’s death, Stalin,
a ruthless pragmatist, sensing the Bolsheviks’ plot to
subsequently undermine his power as well as his nation’s
sovereignty, attempted to get rid of the Bolsheviks. Many
were purged but some escaped, among them his most
influential threat and rival, Leon Trotsky, an obsessive adherent
of a totalitarian socialist world government. While exiled in
Mexico, Trotsky was assassinated by one of Stalin’s henchmen
who drove an ice pick into his skull. Some of the remaining
Bolsheviks and their protégés, who venerated the martyred
Marxist, came to be known as Trotskyites. Their contemporary
counterparts have amended that label, paradoxically, from
Trotskyites to “neo-conservatives.” Neo-conservatives are
alien internationalists, disloyal to America, and they are
backed by the same sources who sponsored the
Bolsheviks. Unlike the wicked but nationally loyal Soviet
dictator Josef Stalin, America’s top leaders have betrayed
the U.S., either allowing themselves to be extorted, or
having been hand-picked from the extortionists’ own ranks.
http://i.am/jah/freedman.htm


The ‘60s and ‘70s revolution served as a continuation in the
spread of a cultural form of Bolshevik Marxism. Only the
names, places, time, and some lines of attack had changed. This
designed cultural upheaval in America – whose victims were
conditioned to believe it to be their own unique struggle for
freedom – is adeptly exposed by William Lind
(www.academia.org/lectures/lind1.html). As Lind states, the
progressive, enlightened way of being a “useful idiot” – as the
Bolshevik leaders privately dubbed their duped Gentile
subordinates – is to be politically correct.
http://i.am/jah/defin.htm


To communicate using political correctness is to spread lies. To
be politically correct, one conveys ideas that he knows to be
false, expresses opinions with which he privately disagrees, and
avers to so-called facts that he knows in his heart are unreal.
http://i.am/jah/truth.htm


Tragically, many Americans – unable to recognize the deception –
actually “believe” this nonsense, others at best treating PC as a
joke. It is not funny. It is deadly. So, are not these American
Gentiles behaving as “useful idiots,” the circulators of damaging
lies? Is this not, as it was intended, a particularly useful aid to
the alien impostors who are firmly entrenched in America’s
institutions and government? How can a patriotic American
feel comfortable while indulging in political correctness? Why
would he even tolerate it? Well, he tolerates it, no doubt for
a variety of reasons, but first and foremost, due to the most
rudimentary of instincts: fear – perhaps fear of a hate-crime
indictment – often, by PC’s guiding principles, a consequence
of merely being honest. Woe to those who defy PC criteria. For
journalists, media personalities and politicians, to be PC is
obligatory for those who value their careers, or, if high enough
in profile, their lives. What may be erroneously interpreted
as not being politically correct, as expressed by some so-called
partisan talk show hosts, is a very cleverly controlled pretext
of opposition. As for the man on the street who does not wish
to encounter this modern pillory of ridicule and demonization
from his peers as well as his detractors, to practice PC is the
easier, softer way. This act of self-preservation via PC, while
supposedly “enlightening” the individual is, nevertheless, a lie
that, rather than enlightening, is victimizing all of Western
civilization. History clearly affirms that “The suppression of
all ‘great’ civilizations has occurred from within.” And, in
accordance with the elitists’ plans, useful-idiot-conservatives,
the flag-waving neo-con/Zionist supporters, are fanning
flames that are cooking the goose that laid the golden
egg. Meanwhile, useful-idiot-liberals, equipped with Orwellian
Newspeak conditioning, which replaces “liberty” with
“license,” have become slaves to their passions, or hedonistic
“freedoms,” affecting the breakdown of the American
family. The family unit has been the backbone of all successful
civilizations. This is merely another revolutionary click of
the ratchet toward a world order, sponsored by the House
of Rothschild and its allied subsidiaries. Alien impostors,
agents of the alliance, have been working tirelessly, training
America’s “useful idiots” to fashion the USA into an
overcooked, spineless remnant – the ashes of what it
had once been. John Otis can be contacted
at: jotis@sover.net.

Thursday, March 6, 2008

"Tolerance "Is A Deceptive And Hateful Ploy

This Is "Intolerance" and" Hate "condemned by the mainstream media
24/7 whenever It occurs . (This was actually a hate hoax carried out
by two rich Brooklyn Jews)


They can hate "Whitey" and call him a pig, and It's 100% tolerant and
an expression of racial pride, according to the media commissars.
More officially sanctioned tolerance from the Commissars of political
correctness.
The future that the PC Bolsheviks mentally ejaculate to fantasizing about !

"Tolerance"- A Sneaky Attack on Your Identity

By Henry Makow Ph.D.
April 28, 2007
For centuries the Masonic central bankers who control Western society
and culture have been pushing "tolerance." Why?

"The Protocols of the Elders of Zion" is a notorious "forgery" that
uncannily explains our predicament. It says the Illuminati bankers
want to "dislocate all collective forces which are still unwilling to submit
to us." (Protocols, Section 5)

The four major collective forces are: Race, Religion, Family and
Nation. They are the four pillars of our human identity.

How do you undermine them? Certainly a frontal attack would meet
with spirited resistance. Instead you promote "tolerance" which
destroys these collective forces by erasing the differences between them.

Thus you have ecumenicalism in religion, miscegenation in race, and
regionalism (i.e. EU, NAU) in nation states. You destroy family by
erasing gender differences.

At this stage, the Masonic bankers perceive Christian and Islamic
nations as their principal adversary. But eventually all national, racial
and religious identity will come under their gun.

"Tolerance" is applied selectively. We must tolerate what undermines
these collective forces but have "zero tolerance" for efforts to resist or
uphold them.

Thus Black rappers can trash Black females but Don Imus is fired for
a passing remark. Zero tolerance for white heterosexual Christians.

Read More.......

Thursday, January 31, 2008

Spanish Jew Leader Wants People Imprisoned For Holocaust "Denial"

Spanish Jew leader and thought cop Jacobo Israel Garzon

"Holocaust denial is "the threshold of hate speech"
and its "depenalization" could lead to the rise in the
distribution of Nazi propaganda. -

Jacobo Israel Garzon


(And aren't you using the same method to silence
free thought and dissent, that you Jews claim the
Nazi's used ?)


What Jewish organizations think of free thought !

Spanish Jewish leader urges jail
terms for Holocaust denial

Full Article:
www.ejpress.org

Sunday, January 20, 2008

Zionist European Thought Police


In Europe If you question the Zionists "official"
Holocaust
facts, you will be arrested and sent to jail.

For more Information on the pro-Zionist
thought police -

Austrian Revisionist Given SIX And A Half Years

Zundel Atty Sylvia Stolz's Last Words In Court - Pt I

Zundel Atty Sylvia Stolz's Last Words In Court - Pt 2


Friday, January 18, 2008

Marxist Hypocrites


Ward Churchill one of the biggest Marxist Hypocrites


Pseudo-Marxist Hypocrites

I'm often amused when I see Marxist-wannabe professors
prattling on about the "ruling classes" and their "exploitation"
of the "working classes". In addition to a shallow and vulgar
version of Marxism, these professors display a staggering
unawareness of the hypocrisy of their situation. In the context
of an academic department at a university,these professors
often exercise powers and privileges arbitrarily and
unaccountably. They may grade students according to
the students' adherence to the professors' political views. They
may use similar ideological litmus tests and personal demands
to reward or punish impoverished graduate students under
their control. They may also sit on hiring and tenure committees,
ruthlessly controlling access to the academic job market using
standards that may be completely arbitrary or ideological. Certainly
not all nor even most professors are of this type, but there are
sufficient examples to see a problem. Much has been written
(legitimately) regarding the leftward ideological skew of most
American universities and the brutal application of administrative
power that can be deployed to enforce compliance. Web sites like
The Foundation for Individual Rights in Education and
SpeechCodes.org document some of the damage. Less visible are
the thousands of students who feel compelled to avoid speaking
or writing their dissenting opinions for fear of retaliation. Indeed,
while these pseudo-Marxist professors like to preen as defenders
of the working class, in the context of a university they are the
oppressive rulers in the Marxist morality play. And while they
may enjoy parading their love of Foucault, they are usually
shockingly lacking in self-reflection about the chilling panopticon
that pervades their own lives and within which they are thoroughly
complicit. This self-delusional pose is not limited to academia, but
extends into politics and entertainment. Notice that the richest
members of the U.S. Senate (Kennedy, Kerry, Corzine) are the

same people who pose as saviors of the "working class". And
the buffoonish Michael Moore concocts an image laden with
blue jeans and ball caps, but reveals at Cannes the reality of the
Hollywood prima donna who insists on the presence of his retinue
of bodyguards, masseuse, and Pilates trainer. For pseudo-Marxists,
love for the masses is a fetish or an affectation, to be worn as a way
to enhance credibility or build one's ego, but certainly not something
that translates into actual respect for persons. Indeed, disagree with
or offend a pseudo-Marxist even in the slightest and you will quickly
learn the short limits of their forebearance for the Great
Unwashed. Academic pseudo-Marxists confronted with their
hypocrisy will use their position to establish dominance or will
lash out, labellin the questioner as a political heretic and social
outcast unworthy of the consociational comradery they supposedly
hold dear. Political pseudo-Marxists will deploy labels of "racist",
"sexist" and "homophobe" to tar and feather dissenters without

actually engaging any of theirarguments. And, as filmmaker
Michael Wilson learned, Michael Moore and his sycophants can
really dish it out but respond violently when asked to take it.

"The closest I got was I did run into him at
the (University of Minnesota) when he was
on his book tour, and he started screaming
at me," says Wilson. The screaming began
when Wilson mentioned the title of his film in
the middle of asking a question. "It was quite
a sight — 7,000 Michael Moore fans, just booing me."

(Full Article from St. Paul Pioneer Press)

Like in Orwell's animal farm, it seems Marxism is
good, provided that everyone is equal, but some
more equal than others.

Source:

Thursday, January 17, 2008

The NWO's Ultimate Aim


Photo from www.patriotnetwork.info



"The Technocratic Age is slowly designing an every day more
controlled society. The society will be dominated by an elite of
persons free from traditional values (!) who will have no doubt
in fulfilling their objectives by means of purged techniques with
which they will influence the behavior of people and will control
and watch the society in all details". "... it will become possible to
exert a practically permanent watch on each citizen of the
world". - Zbigniew Brzezinski, Illuminati and
co-founder
of Trilateral Commission


The Frankfurt School And Political Correctness


The people of North America and Western Europe now accept a level
of ugliness in their daily lives which is almost without precedent in the
history of Western civilization. Most of us have become so inured, that the
death of millions from starvation and disease draws from us no more than
a sigh, or a murmur of protest. Our own city streets, home to legions of
the homeless, are ruled by Dope, Inc., the largest industry in the world, and
on those streets Americans now murder each other at a rate not seen since
the Dark Ages.


At the same time, a thousand smaller horrors are so commonplace as to go
unnoticed. Our children spend as much time sitting in front of television sets
as they do in school, watching with glee, scenes of torture and death which
might have shocked an audience in the Roman Coliseum. Music is
everywhere, almost unavoidable—but it does not uplift, nor even
tranquilize—it claws at the ears, sometimes spitting out an obscenity. Our
plastic arts are ugly, our architecture is ugly, our clothes are ugly. There
have certainly been periods in history where mankind has lived through similar
kinds of brutishness, but our time is crucially different. Our post-World War II
era is the first in history in which these horrors are completely avoidable. Our
time is the first to have the technology and resources to feed, house, educate,
and humanely employ every person on earth, no matter what the growth of
population. Yet, when shown the ideas and proven technologies that can solve
the most horrendous problems, most people retreat into implacable
passivity. We have become not only ugly, but impotent.


Nonetheless, there is no reason why our current moral-cultural situation
had to lawfully or naturally turn out as it has; and there is no reason why
this tyranny of ugliness should continue one instant longer.


Consider the situation just one hundred years ago, in the early 1890's. In
music, Claude Debussy was completing his Prelude to the Afternoon of
a Faun,
and Arnold Schönberg was beginning to experiment with
atonalism; at the same time, Dvorak was working on his Ninth
Symphony, while Brahms and Verdi still lived. Edvard Munch was showing
The Scream, and Paul Gauguin his Self-Portrait with Halo, but in
America, Thomas Eakins was still painting and teaching. Mechanists like
Helmholtz and Mach held major university chairs of science, alongside the
students of Riemann and Cantor. Pope Leo XIII's De Rerum Novarum
was being promulgated, even as sections of the Socialist Second International
were turning terrorist, and preparing for class war.


The optimistic belief that one could compose music like Beethoven, paint
like Rembrandt, study the universe like Plato and Nicolaus of Cusa, and
change world society without violence, was alive in the 1890's—admittedly, it
was weak, and under siege, but it was hardly dead. Yet, within twenty short
years, these Classical traditions of human civilization had been all but swept
away, and the West had committed itself to a series of wars of inconceivable
carnage.


What started about a hundred years ago, was what might be called a
counter-Renaissance. The Renaissance of the fifteenth and sixteenth
centuries was a religious celebration of the human soul and mankind's
potential for growth. Beauty in art could not be conceived of as anything
less than the expression of the most-advanced scientific principles, as
demonstrated by the geometry upon which Leonardo's perspective and
Brunelleschi's great Dome of Florence Cathedral are based. The finest minds
of the day turned their thoughts to the heavens and the mighty waters, and
mapped the solar system and the route to the New World, planning great
projects to turn the course of rivers for the betterment of mankind. About a
hundred years ago, it was as though a long checklist had been drawn up, with
all of the wonderful achievements of the Renaissance itemized—each
to be reversed. As part of this "New Age" movement, as it was then called, the
concept of the human soul was undermined by the most vociferous intellectual
campaign in history; art was forcibly separated from science, and science itself
was made the object of deep suspicion. Art was made ugly because, it was
said, life had become ugly.


The cultural shift away from the Renaissance ideas that built the modern
world, was due to a kind of freemasonry of ugliness. In the beginning, it
was a formal political conspiracy to popularize theories that were
specifically designed to weaken the soul of Judeo-Christian civilization in
such a way as to make people believe that creativity was not possible, that
adherence to universal truth was evidence of authoritarianism, and that
reason itself was suspect. This conspiracy was decisive in planning and
developing, as means of social manipulation, the vast new sister industries
of radio, television, film, recorded music, advertising, and public opinion
polling. The pervasive psychological hold of the media was purposely
fostered to create the passivity and pessimism which afflict our populations
today. So successful was this conspiracy, that it has become embedded in
our culture; it no longer needs to be a "conspiracy," for it has taken on a life
of its own. Its successes are not debatable—you need only turn on the radio
or television. Even the nomination of a Supreme Court Justice is deformed
into an erotic soap opera, with the audience rooting from the sidelines for
their favorite character.


Our universities, the cradle of our technological and intellectual
future, have become overwhelmed by Comintern-style New Age
"Political Correctness." With the collapse of the Soviet Union, our
campuses now represent the largest concentration of Marxist dogma
in the world. The irrational adolescent outbursts of the 1960's have
become institutionalized into a "permanent revolution." Our professors
glance over their shoulders, hoping the current mode will blow over
before a student's denunciation obliterates a life's work; some
audio-tape their lectures, fearing accusations of "insensitivity" by
some enraged "Red Guard." Students at the University of Virginia
recently petitioned successfully to drop the requirement to read
Homer, Chaucer, and other DEMS ("Dead European Males") because
such writings are considered ethnocentric, phallocentric, and generally
inferior to the "more relevant" Third World, female, or
homosexual authors.


This is not the academy of a republic; this is Hitler's Gestapo and Stalin's
NKVD rooting out "deviationists," and banning books—the only thing
missing is the public bonfire.


We will have to face the fact that the ugliness we see around us has been
consciously fostered and organized in such a way, that a majority of the
population is losing the cognitive ability to transmit to the next
generation, the ideas and methods upon which our civilization was
built. The loss of that ability is the primary indicator of a Dark Age. And,
a new Dark Age is exactly what we are in. In such situations, the record
of history is unequivocal: either we create a Renaissance—a rebirth of
the fundamental principles upon which civilization originated—or, our
civilization dies.

I. The Frankfurt School: Bolshevik Intelligentsia

Continues At The Link Below:

www.schillerinstitute.org

Wednesday, January 16, 2008

This Is A Hate Crime ???





http://www.rockawave.com/news/2007/1109/front_page/001p1_xlg.jpg

This was called a "Hate Crime" !

Details:

www.rockawave.com


The Hearst Corporation Thought Police

rense.com

Hearst Corp Blocks Own
Reporters From News Website
From Dick Allgire
1-16-8


I heard an interesting fellow on the Jeff Rense program
recently. His name was Clay Douglas and he kept talking
about the U.S. Constitution and how those in control of
things are subverting it.

I work for the Hearst Corporation as a TV journalist. Now
the computer provided to me at work is owned by Hearst
and I understand that the internet service they give me in
their office is a privilege and not a right, so the company
can tell me what I may or may not look at while I'm on
their payroll. But as a journalist I'm interested in the First
Amendment and wanted to read and consider what Mr.
Douglas has to say. I'm a grown man and fairly astute
after 34 years of being a reporter.

Hearst denied me access to the site
http:// www.freeamerican.com/
because of what they call 'HATE SPEECH.'

This raised some questions in my mind. Why would a
major media corporation prohibit journalists from reading
this site? What is hate speech? And why should it be blocked?
Aloha,
Dick Allgire
Honolulu

Source:

Tuesday, January 15, 2008

The More Zionists Repeat And Propagandize, The More Zionists Desensitize

http://www.amfirstbooks.com/IntroPages/ToolBarTopics/Articles/Featured_Authors/pike_rev_ted/pike_works/pike_art_and_files/A%20Brief%20History%20of%20Thought%20Crime.jpg



German schools are failing in educating students about the
Holocaust, a new study by a political education center has
found, as German youth, who one historian said use the
word "Jew" as a common curse in daily discourse, are
increasingly distant from the suffering of the victims of Nazism.

According to a study commissioned by the Federal Agency
for Civic Education, a political education center known by its
German acronym BPB, history courses no longer manage to
teach Germany's younger generation of the horrors of the Nazis.

In their words, this generation's students are less
sensitive to the horrors of the Holocaust than any before.

Full Article:

www.haaretz.com

Canadian Jewish Congress Hassles Homeless Newspaper

Jewish Congress Menaces
Homeless Newspaper Over
Henry Makow, PhD
By Henry Makow PhD
1-13-8

The Canadian Jewish Congress wants to close
down "The Toronto Street News" over its policy of
running articles from my web site. The loss of
the "Street News" would deprive 50 impoverished
people of about $300 a month which they earn
by selling it, says Editor and Publisher, Victor
Fletcher, 63.


In the statement, Len Rudner, the Ontario
Regional Director for Canadian Jewish
Congress, CJC says:


"In his December 1st article "The Worst
Anti-Semites are Zionists," Henry Makow offers
his theory that the Jewish people somehow
control the world's money. He claims, among other
things, that the Zionists have taken over
the US government and that organized
American Jewry run the central bank. According
to Makow, this (Jewish) cartel "is behind all
major wars and depressions of the past
300 years, behind Communism, Fascism
and the Holocaust, behind 9-11 and
the bogus war on terror."

MY REPLY

Rudner is using the tired, disingenuous
sleight-of-hand of characterizing opposition
to the Zionist political agenda as "hatred
of Jews." By his logic, the majority of
American Jews are antisemitic because
the majority are against the war in Iraq.

Zionism is a gimmick the central banking
cartel uses to cause wars to weaken all
countries and religions and fold them into
a thinly-veiled one-world dictatorship. All
countries are ruled by traitors, "globalists" --who
are the lackeys of this international
cartel. This is why there is not one serious
Presidential contender against the
Iraq war despite majority opposition to the war.

Full Article: